Researchers · public
Aspen Hopkins
Researcher — MIT CSAIL
Lead author of Contra Labs' flagship creative-preference paper and an MIT CSAIL researcher — the academic credibility of the leading competitor rests substantially on her name. Whether she is staff, contractor or collaborator is the most useful unknown in the entire map.
Ask: What the disagreement structure in designer preference data actually looked like, and whether she would collaborate with, or advise, a second entrant.
Reach: MIT CSAIL personal page and arXiv corresponding-author address on 2606.30561; academic collaboration is a legitimate opening.
Tool companies · public
Danny Wu
Head of AI Products — Canva
Canva is the only creative-tool company with a live AI Quality Evaluator posting and a Research Lead - Evaluations function, and he owns AI product quality for 240M+ users. He is the best-qualified single prospect in the buy-side map.
Ask: Whether Canva's evaluation roles are meant to build a permanent internal panel or to specify work it would rather outsource, and what design dimensions it needs scored.
Reach: Regular podcast guest (NVIDIA AI Podcast, Startup Project) and a Canva Create keynote presence — a genuinely public figure.
Practitioners · public
Ed Newton-Rex
Founder & CEO, Fairly Trained — Fairly Trained
He resigned from Stability over training data ethics and now certifies companies on it. He is the most credible single person who could either certify the client's supply terms or dismantle them publicly — and certification is a genuine competitive moat if won.
Ask: Whether Fairly Trained would ever certify an expert-data company on its creator terms rather than its corpus, and what the criteria would be.
Reach: Writes publicly at ed.newtonrex.com; speaks at academic and industry seminars; very responsive on X.
Practitioners · public
Elizabeth Goodspeed
Designer and writer; US editor-at-large, It's Nice That — It's Nice That
She has written the definitive practitioner essays on taste and on why AI cannot supply it, in the publication designers actually read. Her judgement of this company will substantially set how the profession receives it.
Ask: What would make selling aesthetic judgement to AI labs read as dignified professional work rather than as selling out — and what would make it read as the latter.
Reach: Publishes a regular column at It's Nice That and a personal newsletter; speaks at DesignThinkers and similar conferences.
Community · public
Felix Lee
Co-founder & CEO — ADPList
ADPList is a global network of senior designers with publicly bookable mentor profiles — the lowest-friction, highest-trust recruiting surface in existence for exactly this supply, and it is not a portfolio site so quality signal is stronger.
Ask: Whether ADPList would partner on a vetted evaluation panel, and what its mentors would consider fair pay for judgement work.
Reach: He maintains a public ADPList mentor profile that anyone can book — a literal open door.
Competitors · cold
Grace Li
Co-founder & CEO — Intelligence (Design Arena)
Claims $60M ARR selling human design-evaluation data on a ten-person team, and can sell geographic and temporal taste drift that a 30-designer panel structurally cannot produce. Either the strongest comparable in the category or its biggest overstatement — the client needs to know which.
Ask: What a frontier-lab contract for arena data is actually shaped like — seats, consumption, or dataset licence — and whether labs distinguish expert votes from anonymous ones in pricing.
Reach: Active press cycle since Aug 2026 (TechCrunch, Yahoo Finance) and a YC S25 network; approach founder-to-founder or via a shared YC contact.
Competitors · public
Hamidah Oderinwale
Member of Technical Staff — Taste Labs
She writes Taste Labs' public research agenda, including the Requests for Research that telegraph the company's roadmap into edit-sequence and design-trajectory capture. She is the technical mind of the nearest competitor and is publicly soliciting outside researchers.
Ask: Which of the nine open research problems they consider hardest, and whether design-intent inference from edit sequences is a shipped capability or still a wish.
Reach: The Prototype fellowship Airtable form and the research contact link on tastelabs.com are both open, public inbound channels she operates.
Researchers · public
Jordan Taylor
PhD researcher — Carnegie Mellon University
Lead author of the FAccT '26 audit showing LAION-Aesthetics filters by gender and reinforces Western and Japanese realist bias. That paper is simultaneously the best argument for the client's product and the framework by which the client's own panel will be attacked.
Ask: How to build a taste panel that survives the same audit — what pluralistic aesthetic evaluation would actually require.
Reach: arXiv corresponding-author channel on 2601.09896; FAccT 2026 is a public venue.
Practitioners · cold
Karla Ortiz
Concept artist and illustrator; named plaintiff, Andersen v. Stability AI — Independent practice
The most prominent artist litigant against generative AI training and the most effective organiser of creative opposition. She will be among the first to publicly frame a taste-data company as laundering exploitation, and knowing her exact objections is worth more than avoiding them.
Ask: What distinction, if any, she draws between selling artwork for training and selling judgement about outputs — and what terms would make the second acceptable.
Reach: Speaks publicly and often on AI and artists' rights; her public advocacy channels and interviews are open.
Tool companies · public
Noah Levin
VP of Design — Figma
Figma builds design quality entirely in-house, and he is publicly on record wanting more than AI-generated eye candy. Even if Figma never buys, his endorsement is the strongest possible signal to the designer supply that this work is legitimate.
Ask: What Figma would need to see to trust an external design-quality benchmark, and whether Config would host a session on evaluating generated design.
Reach: Figma Config speaker; publishes on the Figma blog; active on design podcasts.
Competitors · cold
Purvanshi Mehta
Co-founder, Lica World; now leading design research at Gamma — Gamma
Corresponding author of the TASTE paper and the person who supplied Contra Labs' reward-modelling capability. She has just moved inside a product company, which means she is simultaneously the most knowledgeable person about this exact product and no longer a competitor to it.
Ask: What signal in designer ratings turned out to be learnable, where existing preference models failed on design, and whether Gamma would buy taste data rather than build it.
Reach: Corresponding author on arXiv 2605.20731; also quoted in TechCrunch on the acquisition, so publicly reachable via press channels.
Model labs · cold
Robin Rombach
Co-founder & CEO — Black Forest Labs
Lead author of the Stable Diffusion work and now CEO of the lab whose own job spec says aesthetic judgement is an RL target requiring preference data. BFL is the most explicit stated demand in the entire buyer map.
Ask: Whether BFL builds its aesthetic preference data in-house in Freiburg or would buy a designer panel, and what dimensions of aesthetic quality it needs labelled.
Reach: Academic and ML conference circuit (CVPR/NeurIPS); BFL's Ashby board signals the post-training team he is staffing.
Investors · public
Sarah Catanzaro
General Partner — Amplify Partners
She co-led Taste Labs' seed and wrote the public thesis for the category, and she is also an investor in Runway. She is the single best-informed outside observer of this exact market and holds a genuine cross-cluster introduction path from investor to lab.
Ask: What she rejected before backing Taste Labs, how she thinks the category defends against arenas, and what a differentiated second entrant would have to look like.
Reach: Publishes under her own byline at Amplify and speaks frequently at data and ML events; publicly reachable.
Practitioners · cold
Scott Belsky
Partner, A24; founder of Behance; former Chief Strategy Officer, Adobe — A24
The only person who has founded the largest creative portfolio network, run strategy at Adobe through the Firefly contributor-compensation decisions, and now sits at A24 — which has a reported $75M AI venture with Google DeepMind. He is the highest-leverage single introduction in this entire map.
Ask: How Adobe actually decided what to pay contributors for training data, and whether A24's DeepMind venture needs professional creative evaluation.
Reach: Writes a public newsletter and speaks widely; Cornell Tech Council and A24 Labs are public affiliations.
Model labs · public
Souki Mansoor
Lead, Global Sora Artist Program — OpenAI
The single most relevant person at OpenAI: she runs the artist programme that turned a boycott into a negotiation, built over ~10 months of relationship-building with a $3M budget. She already does the client's hardest job — persuading working creatives to engage with a lab.
Ask: How artists were recruited and compensated, whether the programme produced any evaluation signal that fed back into training, and whether OpenAI would rather buy that relationship than build it.
Reach: Publicly quoted in Artnet on Sora Selects; speaks about the programme at art and film venues; OpenAI Forum sessions are public.